An act is considered to have been committed without guilt, if the person did not understand and, in the given circumstances, could not understand the social danger of one’s actions (inaction) or did not foresee the possible socially dangerous consequences thereof, and in the given circumstances was not obliged and could not foresee them.

Also, an act is considered to have been committed without guilt, if the person had foreseen the possible socially dangerous consequences of one’s action (inaction), did not wish the emergence thereof, but due to the incompatibility of one’s psychological and physiological properties with the extreme conditions or nervous and mental load, failed to prevent the emergence of these consequences.

The person is subject to criminal liability only for the socially dangerous action or inaction and its socially dangerous consequences, of which he was found guilty by a competent court.

Objective incrimination, i.e., criminal liability for infliction of damage without guilt, is prohibited.

The source: iravaban.net