“Do not be surprised, that is why I am here”: Misak Martirosyan In the result of the renewed judicial sitting on the case of former head of “RA Judicial Department” and others, two officials were questioned in the court as witnesses on 27 April.
Instead of the Speech the Prosecutor filed a Motion he accused said, “They are just killing the time. These are illegal activities carried out by the prosecution who just want to delay the hearing.
The Prosecution “already expires the Reasonable Terms:” Judge Closing the sitting judge Arshak Vardanyan said:” They have asked for time to get prepared, but they expire the reasonable terms.
The Prosecution asked for time to prepare the Speech Տhe prosecutor asked to provide additional time as the speech has not been prepared yet.
The hearing on the case of former Head of the RA Judicial Department State Administrative Agency, Misak Martirosyan and others ended. On today’s sitting the court satisfied the motion of the accused Misak Martirosyan inviting his First Deputy Nora Karapetyan to the court as a witness.
Investigator’s “Fast” Job astonished the Defendant Misak Martirosyan’s advocate filed a motion requesting to invite the investigator who examined the case. Defendant Misak Martirosyan joined the advocate’s motion.
“The Ordinary Crime was turned to Show.” 115 Million Embezzlement Case He said that the preliminary investigation body had been interested in constructing the charge against him.
The Work of the Defendant mediated for Bribe was not assessed duly, so She kept 200 USD for herself I considered the fact that my previous “work was not remunerated” and took 200 USD from this sum.
I put money on Martirosyan’s Table every Month – a total of 20 Million AMD: Pre-Trial Testimony of the Defendant The former head of the judicial department and other officials of the entity were charged in creating a stable group in 2009-2013 and embezzlement of a sum of around 115.782.033 AMD from the State Budget of the RA.
The Defendant provided a Wrong Name: The Case of the former Head of the Judicial Department Today the defender Sasun Khachatryan who was involved in the court trial asked a question to the defendant, why the latter had mentioned in his pre-trial testimony that Gegham Grigoryan provided him bank cards, and he said a different thing in the court.
Witness was keep hungry for hours, and he had to give false testimony. The case of the Former head of the Judicial Department During publication of the testimony the witness stated that the testimony was dictated by the investigators.
Incident at the Court Trial on the Case of the former Head of the Judicial Department and others The witness said that she knew only two of the defendants; Gagik Khachatryan and Gegham Grigoryan.
Why was the Trial of the Former Head of Judicial Department Postponed? Why was the Trial of the Former Head of Judicial Department Postponed?
According to the Witness, he was kept at the Police Station for 30 hours According to the Witness, he was kept at the Police Station for 30 hours