How can you judge 4 people on 4 episodes based on the evidence of 1 person? And in 3 episodes no witness saw any face, there`s no evidence. This was stated by the A during today`s sitting of the Court of appeals.
“There`s one videotape, and the expert says that neither the car numbers, nor the people are visible there, it is uncertain what kind of car it is”.
A also said that the Prosecutor`s office tried to “tailor” the charges of unrevealed case of the victim`s brother`s hayrick burning on them as well.
At today`s sitting the defendant`s lawyer presented evidence on the unlawfulness of the court ruling and requested to overturn the decision and make a decision on excuse.
R`s lawyer Eduard Aghajanyan also presented an appeal to the court.
Defendant G`s lawyer Gayane Lyudvigyan requested to overturn the decision of the court of first instance and make a decision on excuse.
“I have been imprisoned for half a year, being innocent and not knowing what for. Now I am in a bad psychological condition”, said G.
The judges were interested in whether G was a registered employee for the Rs, and he said that even he wasn`t registered, he was being regularly payed a salary every month.
A, R, G are accused of attempting to destroy S`s hayrick in the village of Norapat in Armavir region, and of hooliganism. and Q is charged only based on the hooliganism articles. The defendants do not accept their blame and request the Court of Appeals to make a decision on excuse.
A and R are sentenced to 2,6 months of imprisonment by the Court of First instance in the Region of Armavir, but the Court freed them from the Court hall by an amnesty. G and Q are sentences to 1 year and 1 month of imprisonment, but they were also freed from the court hall based on an amnesty.
Nune Hovsepyan
In order to exercise the right to be forgotten, the name(s)/surname(s), photo(s), video(s) were edited in the publication and do not reflect the data of the real people. 07.06.2018
